tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-643116479245443456.post1454888008605482563..comments2009-01-30T12:26:00.877-08:00Charles Bradshaw, PMPhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17446805402314732853noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-643116479245443456.post-57997821278621889072009-01-30T12:26:00.000-08:002009-01-30T12:26:00.000-08:00Thanks Ken,<BR/><BR/>Actually Mr. Christen has developed quite a track record that speaks for itself. Just Google his name. <BR/><BR/>http://www.csindy.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A10938<BR/><BR/>No one is probited from Bidding a project covered by a PLA. Who does PLA discriminate against, if anyone can bid, win and execute work? <BR/><BR/>Many PLA's have liquidated damages against unions if they strike and methods to force them to the negotiation table. <BR/><BR/>I think you should research this subject before you comment on it. Thanks for the spin. <BR/>:)Charles Bradshawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17446805402314732853noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-643116479245443456.post-45398067293787900732009-01-30T12:18:00.000-08:002009-01-30T12:18:00.000-08:00If the merits of a PLA are so strong why would you have to attack Mr. Christen? It seems to me the issue is really the PLA. Does a PLA allow open competition? (No). Does a PLA discriminate? (Yes). Does a PLA really offer “labor harmony” or guarantee no strikes or work stoppage? (No). If you stick to the facts the merits or lack thereof of a PLA are clear, there aren’t any.Kenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09244903791937696006noreply@blogger.com